Filed under:Authors,Religion — posted by Anwyn on December 11, 2006 @ 10:58 am

Dawn Eden promotes the soul-deep virtues of chastity — in the New York Times!

Via See-Dubya, who dares to think that because Dawn actually is “born again” considers herself to have had a “born-again experience” that it’s okay for the Times to call her “born-again ^ Christian” rather than “Catholic.”

Cross-posted at Electric Venom.

Edited to remove potentially frightening literal implications of “born again.”


  1. I’m almost afraid to ask what “actually is born again” means. Isn’t that a bit like saying it is literally raining cats and dogs?

    Comment by Xrlq — December 11, 2006 @ 11:47 am

  2. Heh, yeah, I guess that’s a bit of a misspeak. I just meant See-Dub thinks the appellation “born-again Christian” applies to Dawn and that Dawn herself described herself as having a “born-again” experience.

    Comment by Anwyn — December 11, 2006 @ 12:04 pm

  3. […] Edited to remove potentially frightening literal implications of “born again.” 12.11.06 at 12:58 pm | More like this:»No related posts Send Trackback Trackback URL for this post: http://www.electricvenom.com/2006/12/11/apologetics/trackback/ […]

    Pingback by Electric Venom » Blog Archive » Apologetics — December 11, 2006 @ 12:13 pm

  4. You’ve been Christmas tagged!

    Comment by Venomous Kate — December 24, 2006 @ 11:29 am

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



image: detail of installation by Bronwyn Lace