It’s supposed to be reporting news, right?
Headline: Libby move helps seal Bush’s Iraq legacy.
If by “seal” you mean “add meaningless fuel to the already high fire of Democrats’ hatred for Geo. W. Bush.” If by “helps” you mean “ends up as a footnote in the larger picture of the Iraq war,” which even somebody quoted in the article admits:
[Presidential historian] Hess said Bush’s move will eventually be seen as a footnote to a legacy that will feature Iraq prominently.
So this major villainous move, supposed to “seal” Bush’s evil legacy, is really only a footnote that happens to be angering Democrats. Reuters wrote the headline for this piece of opinion–theirs–and then couldn’t even find a historian who would back it?
Reuters: even their not-so-disguised opinions are fake.