<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Have You Got Anything Without Spam?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/</link>
	<description>Sometime editor, all-the-time mother, delivering facts, reviews, commentary, and rants. Occasionally in that order.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812445</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812445</guid>
		<description>Though oddly enough, that last comment of mine displayed properly in the same feed.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though oddly enough, that last comment of mine displayed properly in the same feed.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812441</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812441</guid>
		<description>Just saw a couple of the same spams on Google Reader, this time on the comment RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw a couple of the same spams on Google Reader, this time on the comment RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812426</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812426</guid>
		<description>Hey, Matt, I&#039;m really glad this helped you--thanks for taking the time to say so. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Matt, I&#8217;m really glad this helped you&#8211;thanks for taking the time to say so. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812417</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812417</guid>
		<description>... and several other files under the plugins directory with names matching .*.cache.php.  They were filled with random chars inside comment blocks to obfuscate the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and several other files under the plugins directory with names matching .*.cache.php.  They were filled with random chars inside comment blocks to obfuscate the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812416</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812416</guid>
		<description>I just got hacked with this one too.  The backwards code was in the wp-options table and the problem didn&#039;t show up when viewed directly. A friend saw it in google reader. In my case, the actual code was in wp-content/plugins/podpress/optional_files/podpress_trac/.wp-cache.cache.php.  Thanks for the help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got hacked with this one too.  The backwards code was in the wp-options table and the problem didn&#8217;t show up when viewed directly. A friend saw it in google reader. In my case, the actual code was in wp-content/plugins/podpress/optional_files/podpress_trac/.wp-cache.cache.php.  Thanks for the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812352</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812352</guid>
		<description>Whoops. Guess I should have known that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. Guess I should have known that. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812349</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812349</guid>
		<description>FYI, there is a much simpler way to periodically purge spam comments: just check the &quot;Automatically discard spam comments on posts older than a month&quot; option under Akismet configuration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, there is a much simpler way to periodically purge spam comments: just check the &#8220;Automatically discard spam comments on posts older than a month&#8221; option under Akismet configuration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifepundit</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-812130</link>
		<dc:creator>lifepundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-812130</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry you have this problem and am very impressed that you solved it and shared the answer. I use TypePad and don&#039;t think I have this problem, but what do I know? I&#039;m not sure I have any readers.

I&#039;ve toyed with google and other readers but usually just surf the old fashioned way -- through bookmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry you have this problem and am very impressed that you solved it and shared the answer. I use TypePad and don&#8217;t think I have this problem, but what do I know? I&#8217;m not sure I have any readers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve toyed with google and other readers but usually just surf the old fashioned way &#8212; through bookmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2009/07/14/have-you-got-anything-without-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-807205</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/?p=1017#comment-807205</guid>
		<description>Backward code, eh?  Mighty clever.  Apart from that, my knee jerk reaction is to be wary of any code calling &quot;eval.&quot;  Is there any good reason to do that, as opposed to perverse ones like dressing up malicious code as harmless, non-executable data, and then turn around and executing that ostensibly non-executable data after all?  I don&#039;t know much about PHP; I&#039;m assuming it does basically the same thing as its LISP counterpart, and hearkening back to my CS prof&#039;s repeated warning that &quot;EVAL is evil.&quot;  So perhaps I&#039;m off base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backward code, eh?  Mighty clever.  Apart from that, my knee jerk reaction is to be wary of any code calling &#8220;eval.&#8221;  Is there any good reason to do that, as opposed to perverse ones like dressing up malicious code as harmless, non-executable data, and then turn around and executing that ostensibly non-executable data after all?  I don&#8217;t know much about PHP; I&#8217;m assuming it does basically the same thing as its LISP counterpart, and hearkening back to my CS prof&#8217;s repeated warning that &#8220;EVAL is evil.&#8221;  So perhaps I&#8217;m off base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
