<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney&#8217;s Mary Poppins: Practically Subversive to Modern Audiences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/</link>
	<description>Sometime editor, all-the-time mother, delivering facts, reviews, commentary, and rants. Occasionally in that order.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nk</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/comment-page-1/#comment-315041</link>
		<dc:creator>nk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/#comment-315041</guid>
		<description>I thought it was more anti-bourgeois.  Which is neither anti-capitalist nor anti-middle class.  Simply against a certain kind of thinking.  Chitty-Chitty Bang Bang was even more so.

But that&#039;s not what bugs me.  Just exactly what were Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke?  Minor gods?  Siddhe?  Sprites?  Fairies? Leprechauns? Angels?  Saints?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was more anti-bourgeois.  Which is neither anti-capitalist nor anti-middle class.  Simply against a certain kind of thinking.  Chitty-Chitty Bang Bang was even more so.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not what bugs me.  Just exactly what were Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke?  Minor gods?  Siddhe?  Sprites?  Fairies? Leprechauns? Angels?  Saints?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/comment-page-1/#comment-314224</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/#comment-314224</guid>
		<description>Oh! Gotcha, sorry, I am brain-dead lately. I thought I might have written gibberish. :) I see what you mean--on the surface it definitely seems anti-cap--Bank Bad, Bank Men Boogeymen, etc., but I kept being struck by how once the Bank Men had learned their lesson the bank still needed to run. Of course I could be making more out of it than there is, but I liked that it came full-circle and he went on earning his living at what he was obviously good at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! Gotcha, sorry, I am brain-dead lately. I thought I might have written gibberish. :) I see what you mean&#8211;on the surface it definitely seems anti-cap&#8211;Bank Bad, Bank Men Boogeymen, etc., but I kept being struck by how once the Bank Men had learned their lesson the bank still needed to run. Of course I could be making more out of it than there is, but I liked that it came full-circle and he went on earning his living at what he was obviously good at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petitedov</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/comment-page-1/#comment-314220</link>
		<dc:creator>Petitedov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/#comment-314220</guid>
		<description>I know you wrote in your post that it is pro-capitalist (I got that - score 1 for reading comprehension). What i meant was that in looking back, the way I remember the movie, it would seem anti-capitalist (hence the surface part) that&#039;s why I liked your analysis. It was my bad writing that lead to the misunderstanding, not your good writing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you wrote in your post that it is pro-capitalist (I got that &#8211; score 1 for reading comprehension). What i meant was that in looking back, the way I remember the movie, it would seem anti-capitalist (hence the surface part) that&#8217;s why I liked your analysis. It was my bad writing that lead to the misunderstanding, not your good writing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/comment-page-1/#comment-313667</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/#comment-313667</guid>
		<description>No, I meant the movie was *pro*-capitalist and therefore would be upsetting to anti-capitalists. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I meant the movie was *pro*-capitalist and therefore would be upsetting to anti-capitalists. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petitedov</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/comment-page-1/#comment-313663</link>
		<dc:creator>Petitedov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anwyn.com/2008/04/28/disneys-mary-poppins-practically-subversive-to-modern-audiences/#comment-313663</guid>
		<description>I like going back to old children movies (Mary Poppins is one of my favorites) and seeing things I never thought of as a kid about. I guess on the surface it can be looked at as anti-capitalist. I might have to go and re-watch and I don&#039;t even have child as an excuse to do so. I believe the Mary Poppins of today would look very different. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like going back to old children movies (Mary Poppins is one of my favorites) and seeing things I never thought of as a kid about. I guess on the surface it can be looked at as anti-capitalist. I might have to go and re-watch and I don&#8217;t even have child as an excuse to do so. I believe the Mary Poppins of today would look very different. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
