The many faces and IP addy’s from many states and cities of docweasel

A.Weasel, we are legion you are just AHH weasel, not many weasels requiring an actual weasel rack.

That’s like a Wayne’s World take off, my bf and I do that joke constantly, calling one thing AHH computer, AHH beer.

(it was that thing he said to his psychohosebag ex-gf when she bought him a gunrack btw since I’m explaining the joke well its barely a joke).

A Weasel, you’re just a derivative rip-off of the docweasel dynasty.

btw, as I’m sure Anwyn is aware from the IP addresses, docweasel is a shared login that a number of people use.

Just sayin’

And your assertion that you only defend Mttt because you are tired of seeing him criticized is a tautology.

Romney is not the issue, in or out of the race (he is the fav for some on the far right for VP, so the battle continues) the issue is the hypocrisy of erstwhile Mitt supporters.

Hell, the swiftboaters are still bashing Kerry. The battle against evil men never stops, because they don’t, they only rest to regain strength.

I was sure you’d chime in Slu, as one of the foremost Romney apologists. Any criticism of Mittens usually gets rattles your chain and gets a reaction.

Actually, doc, I was a Romney supporter of last resort if anything - hardly a “Mitten” or an apologist. Rudy was my first choice, but he flamed out distressingly quickly.

If anything, I’m just tired of seeing your constant and repetitive stream of anti-Mormon invective at numerous websites. Romney’s out of the race. You’ve got to let him go.

Your attempts to equate Romney’s faith with Wright’s anti-American invective are amusing, but oh so tiresome.

medved accurately takes apart the “them against us” separatist rhetoric, intolerant denigration of “non-tribe members”, shunning of “non-blacks” and putting the “race above all”.

All these things could be attributed to the Mormon philosophy as well, but few commentators had a problem with them.

I’m just surprised, well not really surprised, at the selective outrage by former Mitt backers. They either didn’t bother to examine the odious nature of his cult, or they excused it out of political expediency. To fault Obama backers for the same thing smacks of hypocrisy and dishonesty.

I was sure you’d chime in Slu, as one of the foremost Romney apologists. Any criticism of Mittens usually gets rattles your chain and gets a reaction.

I’m sure, in the interest of consistency, you’ve completely excused Obama from any bad decision-making in the Rev. Wright affair.

You don’t have to be offended by everything that offends me not to be a hypocrite. You just need to be consistent in condemning people who engage in the same behavior. Does Romney get a pass from you because he’s white? Or just because he claims to be a conservative?

You must be offended by everything that offends docweasel. If you aren’t, then you’re a hypocrite.

Or something.

Kind of hypocritical. And yes, a lot of Romney’s theology is just as despicable and repulsive, and worse, its codified in the Book of Mormon.