<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Indiana Joe&#8221; Plan</title>
	<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/</link>
	<description>Sometime editor, all-the-time mother, delivering facts, reviews, commentary, and rants. Occasionally in that order.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-204159</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-204159</guid>
					<description>This sounds a lot like the plan I was thinking of proposing when you suggested holding all primaries on one day.  I didn't get around to posting it then because we were too busy arguing over the merits of &lt;i&gt;ain't,&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;comprised of,&lt;/i&gt; or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds a lot like the plan I was thinking of proposing when you suggested holding all primaries on one day.  I didn&#8217;t get around to posting it then because we were too busy arguing over the merits of <i>ain&#8217;t,</i> <i>comprised of,</i> or whatever.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chuck Foxtrot</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-204023</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-204023</guid>
					<description>That plan is basically what Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) has proposed and was a major reason for the push to have Michigan move up its primary to Jan 15 this year (prompting the DNC to vow that Michigan would seat no delegates).  He claimed the change to the primary date was to highlight the stupidity behind the Iowa first status quo and to shine a light on his new plan (obviously, it didn't do anything he had hoped for).

Conyers plan called for 6 groupings of states that would rotate each election cycle.  Sounds reasonable to me, but the DNC and RNC have their collective heads shoved so far up their rears they can't seem to see the logic that 95% of the rest of us have already grasped...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That plan is basically what Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) has proposed and was a major reason for the push to have Michigan move up its primary to Jan 15 this year (prompting the DNC to vow that Michigan would seat no delegates).  He claimed the change to the primary date was to highlight the stupidity behind the Iowa first status quo and to shine a light on his new plan (obviously, it didn&#8217;t do anything he had hoped for).</p>
<p>Conyers plan called for 6 groupings of states that would rotate each election cycle.  Sounds reasonable to me, but the DNC and RNC have their collective heads shoved so far up their rears they can&#8217;t seem to see the logic that 95% of the rest of us have already grasped&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-203962</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-203962</guid>
					<description>Don't even get me started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chuck Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-203961</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2008/01/30/the-indiana-joe-plan/#comment-203961</guid>
					<description>Cool. Now can he fix the BCS with some playoffs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Now can he fix the BCS with some playoffs?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
