<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hobbit Party Not Over</title>
	<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/</link>
	<description>Sometime editor, all-the-time mother, delivering facts, reviews, commentary, and rants. Occasionally in that order.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-2183</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-2183</guid>
					<description>LagunaDave, I'm not too far off you in your assessment of Jackson &#038; Co.'s rendering of the story, but far more irritating to me would be a hodgepodge--if &lt;i&gt;Hobbit&lt;/i&gt; had a totally different look and feel than the trilogy. It would have to be really good for me to be able to overlook that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LagunaDave, I&#8217;m not too far off you in your assessment of Jackson &#038; Co.&#8217;s rendering of the story, but far more irritating to me would be a hodgepodge&#8211;if <i>Hobbit</i> had a totally different look and feel than the trilogy. It would have to be really good for me to be able to overlook that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: LagunaDave</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-2176</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-2176</guid>
					<description>I have pretty mixed feelings about Peter Jackson after the way he mangled the story-line of LotR.  He did a fantastic job on the filming, casting, artwork and all that, but I wish somebody with more respect for the integrity of the story had done the screenplay.

It's also hard for me to get too excited about The Hobbit.  It's an entertaining children's story, but it doesn't compare to the trilogy, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have pretty mixed feelings about Peter Jackson after the way he mangled the story-line of LotR.  He did a fantastic job on the filming, casting, artwork and all that, but I wish somebody with more respect for the integrity of the story had done the screenplay.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also hard for me to get too excited about The Hobbit.  It&#8217;s an entertaining children&#8217;s story, but it doesn&#8217;t compare to the trilogy, IMO.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-1910</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-1910</guid>
					<description>It could be, but if so, I think they're miscalculating, on the arithmetic alone--they lose far more money up front by not hiring Jackson than they would by paying him. At least in salary. Back-end profits are what the lawsuit's about. I found the letter's description of the lawsuit interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be, but if so, I think they&#8217;re miscalculating, on the arithmetic alone&#8211;they lose far more money up front by not hiring Jackson than they would by paying him. At least in salary. Back-end profits are what the lawsuit&#8217;s about. I found the letter&#8217;s description of the lawsuit interesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mad William Flint</title>
		<link>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-1775</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.anwyn.com/2006/11/21/hobbit-party-not-over/#comment-1775</guid>
					<description>hmm. If I didn't know better (not that I do) I'd say someone just doesn't want to have to pay Peter Jackson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm. If I didn&#8217;t know better (not that I do) I&#8217;d say someone just doesn&#8217;t want to have to pay Peter Jackson.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
